YOU ARE AT:Archived ArticlesAdelstein: CTIA should take LNP issues to FCC before going to court

Adelstein: CTIA should take LNP issues to FCC before going to court

WASHINGTON-The Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association would be better served by going to the Federal Communications Commission with its complaints rather than to court, said FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein reacting to CTIA’s filing of a document urging the agency to rule on nine issues it says are necessary for effective wireless local number portability.

“I think it is preferable that they come to the agency directly rather than going to court,” said Adelstein on Tuesday in a press briefing dominated by the contentious media-ownership issue.

Wireless LNP allows a customer to keep his or her telephone number when switching carriers. It is generally available in the wired world.

CTIA announced its intention to file the petition for declaratory ruling on Monday and threatened that it would seek legal remedies if the FCC does not rule on its contents before Labor Day.

The agency is awaiting word from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on its appeal of the Nov. 24 wireless LNP deadline, but many observers of the April oral argument do not believe the D.C. Circuit will let the industry out of the requirement.

State regulators believe the nine issues CTIA raises are a red herring. “This is their Hail Mary Pass,” said James Bradford Ramsay, general counsel of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners.

The issues-all of which CTIA says are old-are as follows:

  • Rate Centers: In the wireline context, carriers are only required to port a number to a carrier with a switch in the same rate center-a geographic distinction not used by wireless carriers. If this rule is allowed to stand, CTIA believes only 8 percent of customers wishing to cut the cord would be able to switch from a wireline to a wireless carrier and keep their wireline telephone number;
  • The rural issue of wireless-to-wireless porting: Do carriers have to port to another wireless carrier outside their rate centers?
  • Impact on roaming: Because wireless LNP is only initially required in the top 100 metropolitan service areas, what happens if a customer with a ported number is roaming? Will the network be required to recognize the customer?
  • What MSAs are required to implement wireless LNP? There is some confusion because the 2000 census changed the rankings of some MSAs but the rules for wireless LNP date back to the late 1990s;
  • How fast must a number be ported? In the wireline context the standard is four days;
  • If a long time interval (several days) is allowed, what does this mean for wireless enhanced 911 Phase I, which requires a call-back number?
  • Interconnection issues-which encompass two of the CTIA nine concerns: Will wireless carriers have to renegotiate interconnection agreements with wireline carriers to carry out wireless LNP? In a conference call with reporters, state regulators said the wireless industry has known it would have to renegotiate the agreements. CTIA claims the process would be cumbersome and time consuming; and
  • Can wireline carriers charge toll rates for numbers ported outside the rate center? Some wireless carriers are already experiencing this phenomenon when they decided to no longer pay for extended access toll calling.

ABOUT AUTHOR