Site icon RCR Wireless News

The Sunday Brief: Where are they spending money?

Jim Patterson

End of the month/ quarter greetings from Cedar Rapids, Kansas City, Nashville, and, by the time you read this, Washington DC.  Pictured is one of the wonderful CellSite Solutions cranes getting ready for a shelter lift. The first two weeks on the job have been fantastic, and the well wishes from many of you are greatly appreciated.

We will use the interim Briefs to talk more about the telecom shelter remanufacturing business and how you can help.  And, as we indicated while at Fastwyre Broadband, the opinions expressed in The Sunday Brief are the author’s alone and may not reflect those of CellSite Solutions. 

News flow has not been short the last two weeks, but we will spend most of this Brief discussing capital plans for the wireless carriers and cable companies.  We performed a similar analysis two years ago and think a refresher will help readers establish a realistic baseline for the remainder of 2024 and 2025. 

The fortnight that was

Since our mid-June Brief, the Fab Five have added $166 billion in value and the Telco Top Five have added $27 billion.  The strongest gains have come from Amazon (who announced new plans to compete against Chinese online giant Temu – more here) and from Google.  In the telco space, the gains have come from AT&T, Verizon and Comcast. 

Notably, Amazon crossed the $2 trillion market value this week.  Since the end of 2021 (what many call the “COVID peak”), Amazon has managed to grow their equity market capitalization by ~7.5% on an annualized basis.  This is notable considering the profit tailwinds driven by “at home” activities, as well as the company’s investment approach (no buybacks, no dividend). 

Many analysts mistakenly attribute Amazon’s market gains to the Artificial Intelligence (AI) trend.  As the nearby chart shows, however, Amazon (green line) bears a striking resemblance to another retail heavyweight, Walmart (blue line), who does not have an AWS unit.  Over the 5.5-year horizon shown, Amazon’s equity value has gained just over 40% more than Walmart, but both have been on a tear this year.  Through the first six months of 2024, Walmart has slightly outpaced Amazon (+28.9% for WMT vs. +27.2% for AMZN, and that excludes another 0.6% return through Walmart’s dividend).

Whether this year’s change can be attributed to changing economic purchasing patterns at Walmart (see this Bloomberg article from late March which describes how higher income families are increasingly shopping there) or an indication that AWS’ market leadership is losing ground is anyone’s guess.  What it does show is that “big cap” is winning, and Amazon’s AWS unit performance is not the main driver of the Seattle company’s terrific rebound. 

Verizon’s new look

In telecom, two major news events occurred over the last fortnight.  There were several price increases taken by telecommunications providers which were described in last Saturday’s interim Brief (here).  How these will impact the earnings and competitive pictures throughout 2024 will be one of many topics in our July 14 second quarter earnings preview Brief. 

The second big event, however, was Verizon’s rebranding (here).  On top of the rebranding, the company also revamped their home broadband offering, now called Verizon myHome.  With the exception of Apple Music Family and Apple One (to be debuted in the third quarter), the “adder” purchasing model that changed Verizon’s consumer wireless business has now been duplicated for home broadband.  We view this as a very positive way for consumers to try new streaming channels/ bundles without having to sign up for a long-term contract.  It is unclear, however, how myHome will intersect with the legacy +play platform (we assume it will replace it within a year, but the announcement was silent). 

Verizon also expanded their trade-in program, and also took a page out of the T-Mobile playbook with a new Verizon Access program which rewards customers with “pre-sales, free giveaways, and highly sought after events.” The company has historically had a difficult time maintaining a loyalty program and it will be interesting to see how this one fares. 

The big news, however, was the new logo.  As the above picture shows, the  checkmark logo (left) has been replaced with a glowing “V” (right).  The introduction of a second color into the iconic logo was especially interesting, particularly the choice of yellow.  In the extended commercial (here) debuting the new brand and messaging (all around the word “now”), Verizon shows an entirely yellow version of the logo (see screen shot nearby).  We really like the use of an additional color but wonder if Sprint has been gone long enough to avoid resurrecting that association (and, for long-timers who remember Sprint’s “Be There Now” campaign in the 1990s, the tagline). 

It’s a bold move, and Verizon is a brand investment champion.  Time will tell if yellow was the right palette addition. 

The Supreme Court overturns the Chevron Deference

Amongst many Supreme Court decisions handed down last week was the overturning of the Chevron Deference (ruling here).  The New York Times summarizes this legal term as follows (article here): 

“That decision held that when Congress passes a law that lacks specificity, courts must give wide leeway to decisions made by the federal agencies charged with implementing that law. The theory was that scientists, economists and other specialists at the agencies have more expertise than judges in determining regulations and that the executive branch is also more accountable to voters.”

The overturning of Chevron has wide implications for the health care, industrial/ environmental, and banking/ financial services sectors.  Telecommunications is not immune either, as the authority to determine Title II classification by the FCC largely depends on how the agency defines a utility.  The Verge has an excellent (but lengthy) article summarizing some of the possible changes that could occur with respect to Title II classification and recently enacted net neutrality rulings.  Here’s a brief excerpt from the article: 

“For example, even when the FCC previously chose to classify ISPs in a way that would lead to lighter-touch regulation, the Supreme Court ruled in National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. Brand X Internet Services that Chevron deference should be applied to the FCC’s interpretation of the Communications Act. “Brand X’s conclusion that the statute at issue is ambiguous made it highly likely that reviewing courts applying Chevron would uphold the net neutrality rules under review regardless of whether they were regulatory or deregulatory,” [University of Pennsylvania law professor Christopher] Yoo wrote. 

Interestingly, several ISPs are currently challenging the FCC’s net neutrality authority (see this Broadband Breakfast article here).  The result is that more second guessing of the FCC’s decisions will wind up in the courts.  We will have more on the overturning of the Chevron deference in future Briefs. 

Where are they spending money?   

Every year, we update our capital spending tracker for each of the Telco Top Five.  The high-level notes are published below (additional details available upon request). 

Subscribe now to get the daily newsletter from RCR Wireless News

Subscribe

Here’s the TLDR version: 

Here are the major excerpts from each company’s earnings calls and quarterly earnings reports that back up the statements: 

Verizon (from their 10-Q): 

“We continue to invest in our wireless networks, high-speed fiber and other advanced technologies to position ourselves at the center of growth trends for the future. During the three months ended March 31, 2024, these investments included $4.4 billion for capital expenditures.  Capital expenditures for 2024 are expected to be in the range of $17.0 billion to $17.5 billion.

We are focusing our capital investment on building our next generation 5G network, while also adding capacity and density to our 4G LTE network. We are densifying our networks by utilizing macro and small cell technology, in-building solutions and distributed antenna systems. Network densification enables us to add capacity to address increasing mobile video consumption and the growing demand for IoT products and services on our 5G and 4G LTE networks. We obtained full access to our C-Band spectrum in August 2023, and will continue deploying this spectrum across the continental U.S.”

Key metrics for Verizon (cited by Joe Russo, President of Global Networks and Technology): 

AT&T (from their 10-Q)

“The amount of capital expenditures is influenced by demand for services and products, capacity needs and network enhancements. Our capital expenditures and vendor financing payments were slightly elevated in 2023, reflecting strategic investments. In 2024, we expect that our capital investment, which includes capital expenditures and cash paid for vendor financing, will be in the $21,000 to $22,000 range.”

Areas of focus/ key metrics for AT&T (from various documents/ sources): 

T-Mobile (from their 10-K, 10-Q and other management reports): 

Capital spending trends:

Comcast – per their 10-K, 10-Q reports and management presentations:

Charter: 

Detailed capital expenditures (current quarter in first table; 2023 vs. 2022 in second):

That’s it for this week.  Thanks again for all your support and referrals.  The next Brief will focus on key metrics to look for in 2Q earnings.  Until then, if you have friends who would like to be on the email distribution, please have them send an email to sundaybrief@gmail.com and we will include them on the list (or they can sign up directly through the website).

Until then, a Happy Birthday to my dad, Dean Patterson, who turns 88 today.  Also, go Sporting KC and Kansas City Royals! 

Important disclosure:  The opinions expressed in the Sunday Brief are those of Jim Patterson and Patterson Advisory Group, LLC, and do not reflect those of CellSite Solutions, LLC, or Fort Point Capital. 

Exit mobile version